History may bend and powerful nations may attempt to rewrite events, but truth rarely stays buried. When the Pakistan May 2025 conflict erupted, the world saw how rapidly global narratives can shift to suit strategic interests. Memory becomes selective, and diplomatic postures evolve not by principle, but by profit and ambition.
In early May 2025, India initiated aggression against Pakistan. At that critical moment, then U.S. Vice President JD Vance claimed that the United States had “nothing to do with the disputes between Pakistan and India.” The statement, framed as neutrality, disappointed New Delhi, which had expected strong Western support in its adventure.
But neutrality vanished the moment Pakistan’s armed forces responded decisively on May 8–9, securing military success and forcing India to pull back. Suddenly, Washington leapt forward, playing the role of a “village Chaudhry,” as though it had always been a peacekeeper. Had India been winning, no such diplomatic intervention would have materialized.
Pakistan’s strategic response—swift, disciplined, and rooted in national dignity—rewrote expectations across the region. Yet once the dust settled, the United States quietly shifted its narrative, claiming to have “stopped the war.” Western media echoed this line, underreporting losses and crediting diplomacy instead of acknowledging Pakistan’s own deterrence and preparedness.
Where Interests Trump Morality
Behind the scenes, reality was stark. If American-made aircraft in the Indian fleet had fallen instead of French ones, Washington’s tone would have been dramatically different. U.S. defense interests in India’s billion-dollar arms market shaped the quiet diplomacy that followed. Soon after, Washington and New Delhi initiated discussions that led to a ten-year defense cooperation framework, securing India’s position as one of America’s largest arms buyers.
This episode revealed an uncomfortable truth — global politics follows profit, not principle. Pakistan’s leadership recognized this pattern long ago: Western encouragement often rewards aggression and punishes restraint, while calls for “peace” accompany massive arms deals.
Self-Reliance Over Shifting Loyalties
Pakistan cannot rely on shifting global loyalties. The stalled commitments of the U.S. Naval “Enterprise” once again remind us that alliances built on convenience rarely endure during crisis. Pakistan’s security and dignity must continue to rest on:
-
Self-reliance
-
Regional cooperation
-
Strong leadership
-
Strategic clarity
The Pakistan May 2025 conflict proved that peace is preserved through strength, not dependency.
A Lesson for the Future
As new diplomatic pressures emerge and global powers court Pakistan for their own interests, one lesson remains central: Pakistan’s destiny lies in its own decisions, not in foreign assurances. Narratives may be rewritten in Washington or New Delhi, but the facts on the ground remain unchanged.
When power politics attempted to obscure truth, Pakistan stood firm. History will record that while others hesitated, Pakistan acted with clarity and honor.
And beyond the smoke of May 2025, one truth continues to echo — strength commands respect, and dignity shapes destiny.
Muhammad Mohsin Iqbal serves as the Director General (Research) at the National Assembly Secretariat, Parliament House, Islamabad. With extensive experience in legislative research and policy analysis.
