Shaynaz Baloch with female members of the BLA women’s wing
Shaynaz Baloch, identified by the BLA as commander of its women’s wing, with female members of the group. — File photo

The banned BLA has released another list of women it claims are missing, but the list has drawn scrutiny as some cases have previously been linked by authorities to terrorists activity or recruitment by terrorist groups.

The list includes women reported missing for periods ranging from several weeks to more than a year, with some names accompanied by the number of days they have remained missing.

The list includes Majbeen, Nasreen, Hair Nisa, Shakila, Gul Banok, Hasina, Khadija, Zubaida, Zarnaz, Habiba, Shahnaz, Sharnaz, Aqsa, Umaira, Najmia, Parsia, Zaker and Safia Baloch.

Khair-un-Nisa

One of the clearest recent examples is Khair-un-Nisa, a young woman whose case was initially discussed in the context of a disappearance but whom authorities later presented as having been recruited and prepared for a suicide attack in Islamabad. Balochistan Chief Minister Sarfraz Bugti said in May that intelligence agencies had intercepted her before she could carry out the attack and accused the BLA of using psychological manipulation, coercion and threats to recruit young women.

The case became particularly significant because authorities said the woman had allegedly been undergoing terrorist training. Bugti said she would be handed back to her family rather than prosecuted, citing her age and the circumstances in which she had allegedly been recruited.

Shaynaz Baloch

The emergence of Shaynaz Baloch as the publicly identified commander of the BLA’s women’s wing has provided another indication that women’s involvement is no longer limited to peripheral or support roles. The BLA announced the formation of its women’s wing in May 2026 and publicly identified Shaynaz as its commander. The Jamestown Foundation described the development as part of the organisation’s broader shift towards incorporating women into active terrorist operations.

Shaynaz’s case is particularly notable because her family subsequently publicly distanced itself from her, according to Dawn, after she was identified by the BLA as a commander. Her relatives said they had no connection with her activities.

This development matters when assessing the wider missing-person debate. A person being reported missing does not, by itself, establish either innocence or involvement in terrorism. But equally, a missing-person designation cannot automatically be treated as proof that an individual has had no connection with militant networks.

The BLA’s own evolution demonstrates why individual cases require closer scrutiny.

The organisation’s creation of a dedicated women’s wing has further institutionalised that trend. Rather than women appearing only as isolated recruits, the BLA has now publicly presented a structure through which women can be recruited, organised and promoted within the terrorist organisation.

Other cases have also raised questions about how women become entangled with terrorist networks.

The broader problem, therefore, is not that every woman appearing on a missing-person list should be labelled a terrorists. Rather, the increasingly documented recruitment of women by terrorist organisations means that every case cannot automatically be reduced to a single political narrative without examining the circumstances surrounding the disappearance.

The government has already moved against women it says are involved in terrorist activity. In August, Balochistan authorities announced rewards of Rs1 million to Rs1.5 million for information leading to the capture of nine wanted women allegedly associated with Fitna al-Hindustan. The government said the women were involved in anti-state activities and were also being used to influence other women.

Taken together, these developments point to a changing security environment in Balochistan. The question is no longer simply whether women are being used by militant organisations; there is now public evidence that the BLA has created structures specifically to recruit and deploy women.

That reality makes the missing-person debate more complicated. Genuine cases of disappearance require investigation and due process, but claims surrounding missing women also need to be examined against the documented evolution of militant recruitment.

What is increasingly difficult to ignore, however, is that the BLA has itself publicly demonstrated its willingness to recruit women, give them organisational roles and use them in terrorist operations.